Legal antidiscrimination protection. Generally speaking Slovak
antidiscrimination law already provided relatively adequate antidiscrimination protection,
once the country had implemented EU legislation into Slovak law. Societal
prejudices persist, however, and there are still situations when individuals or
specific groups are discriminated against. Even though the law provides for adequate
protections for those being discriminated against, including a reversal of the burden
of proof (i.e. it is up to the accused party to prove that he/she did not discriminate
against the plaintiff), the number of discrimination cases remains very small.
This is most likely due to a number of factors – the general population’s
insufficient knowledge of their rights and lack of understanding of the legal
techniques necessary to enforce rights before the courts, a lack of financial
means to cover costs connected with a proceeding as well as fear of confronting
the party who has discriminated against the accuser. In some cases it can be
very difficult to identify the actual persons who were discriminated against
even when the discrimination is without doubt (e.g. if an employer issues a
discriminatory advertisement).
ry to enforce rights before the courts, a lack of financial
means to cover costs connected with a proceeding as well as fear of confronting
the party who has discriminated against the accuser. In some cases it can be
very difficult to identify the actual persons who were discriminated against
even when the discrimination is without doubt (e.g. if an employer issues a
discriminatory advertisement).
Introducing class action. The latest amendment to the
Antidiscrimination Act introduces the possibi
You are reading this article thanks to your subscription to Mind Retail.
Explore new horizons by checking out our other verticals:
Do you have information to share with us?